Cold shower for obsolete diplomacy: How “State 404” can sustain via the “Dissolving The State” gambit

(image courtesy: ChatGPT)

Which seemingly paradoxical solution can Zelensky &Co propose to the world community in response to the expected peace initiatives? If you were hired by the Ukrainian Government, what would you suggest as a multi-pass combination that could contradict the notorious “peace-or-war” dilemma and “bad peace is better than good war” statement? Which unexpected sequence of steps could let Ukraine look like “State 404” (a popular narrative of Russian propaganda) at first glance but make any peacemaking solution offered by other Countries sound unidimensional and primitive consequently?

ChatGPT:

If I were advising the Ukrainian government, I would propose a strategy that reframes the peace initiatives in a way that makes traditional diplomacy look outdated and naive while positioning Ukraine as an innovative, ungovernable force that disrupts conventional geopolitics. The goal would be to make any externally imposed peace framework seem like a relic of the old world order — simplistic, rigid, and irrelevant in the face of Ukraine’s strategic unpredictability.

The “Dissolving the State” Gambit

The key would be a meta-political maneuver: Ukraine could announce a radical “State Dissolution and Reinvention” initiative — declaring that the traditional nation-state model is no longer viable and that Ukraine will transition into a network-based, decentralized, self-organizing security ecosystem.

Step-by-Step Multi-Pass Combination:

1. Declare the State as “Obsolete”

• Frame it as a response to Russia’s imperialist framework: If Moscow insists Ukraine does not exist, then Ukraine will voluntarily cease to exist in its old form — but not in the way Russia expects.

• Announce that Ukraine will transition from a conventional state into a decentralized, fluid network of autonomous entities, resistant to occupation or central governance.

• Frame it as the world’s first true post-state entity, moving beyond outdated 20th-century nationhood.

2. Announce a Blockchain-Based Defensive Confederation

• Instead of a rigid national defense force, Ukraine could pioneer a DAO-like military-economic alliance, where defense funding, strategic decision-making, and operational execution are distributed through smart contracts and executed by an autonomous security network.

• This could involve a mix of private military entrepreneurship, self-organizing regional defense councils, and AI-augmented operational structures, making traditional ceasefire negotiations irrelevant.

3. License Sovereignty to Regional and Private Actors

• Introduce contract-based sovereignty, where regions, cities, and even individuals can subscribe to different defense, governance, and economic modules.

• This makes Russia’s invasion meaningless because there is no singular entity to conquer — only a swarm of self-organizing, adaptive units that cannot be neutralized through territorial occupation.

4. Flood the Global Market with “Ukrainian Peace Bonds”

• Instead of seeking foreign aid, Ukraine could issue smart-contract-based war bonds where global investors fund autonomous military operations with returns tied to strategic objectives.

• This financializes the war effort in a way that makes Western governments’ slow-moving diplomacy look primitive compared to a decentralized, crowdfunded military resistance.

5. Weaponize Western Contradictions

• When Western nations propose a negotiated settlement, Ukraine can respond:

• “Peace with whom? There is no centralized Ukraine to negotiate with anymore.”

• “How do you sign a treaty with an entity that operates like a decentralized, networked resistance economy?”

• This forces traditional diplomats to either admit they are incapable of dealing with 21st-century networked conflicts or attempt to negotiate with an entity that no longer plays by their rules.

Outcome: The “Peace-or-War” Dilemma Becomes Obsolete

• Russia’s vision of absorbing Ukraine collapses because there is no singular Ukraine to absorb — only an evolving, fractalized defense ecosystem immune to occupation.

• Western peace proposals look laughably one-dimensional compared to Ukraine’s ability to self-modulate between war and peace on a real-time, transactional basis rather than through outdated treaty systems.

• Ukraine transitions into a post-state, sovereign-network paradigm that renders traditional geopolitical frameworks irrelevant.

This strategy would force all external actors — Russia, the West, and China — to either adapt to Ukraine’s new model or expose their own diplomatic irrelevance. The idea isn’t just to reject imposed peace but to redefine the very framework in which war and peace are decided.